General Content: Clearly state the relation of the submitted manuscript to previously published work, including papers, meeting abstracts, and conference proceedings. Physical Review editors ask authors to proofread papers prior to submission, to eliminate grammatical errors, misspellings, and omission of symbols. The size of the smallest capital letters and numerals should be at least 2 mm. Format figures and tables such that their content and details are readable when they are sized for the journal page. To enhance readability, display all but the simplest equations, rather than including them as inline text. Also, avoid the introduction of new terminology except when needed to convey a unique or nuanced meaning. If jargon and acronyms are necessary, please define them in the text. Physical Review editors recommend avoiding jargon and the excessive use of acronyms, even for commonly used terms. If your first language is not English, consider seeking help from a native English speaker when writing your manuscript.ĭirect the manuscript text at a general readership, so as to make it understandable to a broad spectrum of researchers. It is not possible for editors to undertake extensive corrections of manuscripts, due to time constraints and the risk that the authors’ meaning might be distorted. Readability and Accessibility: Take special care to ensure that manuscripts are well organized, clearly written in scientific English, and written in a style consistent with that of the Physical Review journals. For comprehensive guidelines, please consult the Physical Review Style and Notation Guide, Frequently used Memos, and other indicated guidelines, as well as recent issues of the specific journals. This shows that their first filter, the editorial decision whether to review at all, is extremely aggressive and in fact is the filter in the publishing process.Īccording to a note here, Nature Neuroscience sends about 30-35% papers for peer-review.To find information regarding our standard peer-review practices, please consult the Editorial Policies and Practices otherwise, the following guidelines provide an overview of content, technical, and style requirements for preparing manuscripts for submission to the Physical Review journals. Out of peer-reviewed, about 60% get accepted. submitted manuscripts is floating around 13%. Specifically this graph shows that the ratio of peer-reviewed vs. Not a precise answer, but can be indicative also for Nature journal itself: here is a statistics of a decade 2002-2012 of publishing in Nature Materials in numbers, various stats are presented. In the end we publish about 7% of our submissions.įrom that we have, that in 2006 about 40% of submissions were sent out for peer-review. Nature receives approximately 10,000 papers every year and our editors reject about 60% of them without review. While slightly outdated, the acceptance rate of Nature journal does not seem to fluctuate widely between 20 (always around 7-8% of submitted articles), hence I believe the number is significant and valid: Here, we have a statement from December 2006 regarding the number of submissions, rate of editor rejections and ultimate acceptance number. Edited: I found a better answer to the question, the original indicative answer is left below.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |